The Pamela Colman Smith / Rider-Waite tarot deck is one of the most popular decks ever. An astounding number of artists draw from the images of this one deck to create infinite variations of their own. In many ways it has become the de facto standard to which many other decks are compared. But it is NOT the first deck ever drawn. It is an interpretation of tarot, born out of the mind of A. E. Waite and Pamela Colman Smith. Their ideas evolved from the influence of the occult, and the occult societies of thier time. The occultists came up with many inventive ideas to breathe life into the images of tarot, always, it would seem, with the idea that tarot was more than just a game.
As a game, older decks appeared to use a design that included a more logical structure than what is seen in later decks like Rider/Waite/Smith. I believe the influence of occult societies, devoted to the study and perpetuation of mysteries, has pulled the underlying structure of tarot away from its game-like roots. The Numerical Tarot, is an attempt to rise above - or step outside of - the occult world of mysticism, and approach the symbolism of tarot in a whole new way. By abandoning the mystical rhetoric of occult societies, the Numerical Tarot attempts to recreate a more game-like structure. By superimposing this logical structure over the Rider/Waite/Smith deck, the Numerical Tarot attempts to show how a logically deduced system of common sense patterns in nature - that does not center around occult mysticism, or any other cultural bias - can bring improved clarity to the symbolism of traditional tarot.
NOTE: It is NOT the goal of The Numerical Tarot to duplicate the form of the Rider/Waite/Smith deck, or any other deck. This comparison analysis is only done to show the amazing similarities that can be seen between two decks of dissimilar origin, purpose and design. This is not to be considered a historical proof of anything. This comparison is only being offered to help traditional minded tarot people adjust to the ideas put forth elsewhere on this site, and help them find a reason to study the Numerical Tarot further.
Before you read any of this though, you really should take the Nickel Tour and familiarize yourself with the drawings of my deck and the way I lay out my deck. You may also want to examine the section of this site devoted to determining Names and Titles for a deck based on the All Things Are Numbers approach. There is also an essay in the BOOK section of this site called The Spine of Tarot, that explains how this deck attempts to improve upon the design of tarot with the use of logical symmetry, contrast and consistency. You might also want to check out an essay entitled A Few Minor Changes to see how the All Things Are Numbers approach changes the Minors to be more consistently light and dark. In addition you might want to examine a series of charts that display the layout of this deck with key words that have been sorted into Adjectives, Nouns and Verbs. Take a look and see if you can see any similarities there, between The Numerical Tarot and a traditional deck like the RWS.
Here is a chart that sums up where I think my Numerical Tarot cards match, sort of match, maybe match, don't really match, or might match - depending on your opinion and how much you want to manipulate traditional interpretations.
And here is that analysis...
|
